PracticePanther vs. PC Law

Although PC Law offers features such as matter management, billing, and legal accounting, it falls short in providing a comprehensive solution for all aspects of law practice management. Users may need to seek out additional software to fill in the gaps and manage other essential areas of their practice. Users have also claimed that the interface is outdated.

PC Law's reporting capabilities are limited to a set of standard financial reports, leaving users unable to generate custom reports that could provide deeper insights into their law firm's performance. Adding to this limitation, certain PC Law reports are generated through Time Matters via PCLaw Link, further restricting the ability to customize reports. This lack of flexibility in reporting can be a significant barrier to maximizing the effectiveness of a law practice.

While PC Law markets itself as a solution for law firms to manage billing operations, it does not provide any online payment capabilities. This outdated approach can result in a longer case process, inefficient payment handling, and an increased risk of human errors.

PC Law does not provide any task management features, leaving law firms unable to automate repetitive tasks. This limitation can result in an accumulation of tasks, making it difficult to keep track of everything that needs to be done.

PC Law does not provide the option to create custom tags for any of its features, which can result in disorganized case management and reduced productivity. By lacking the ability to create personalized tags, users may struggle to efficiently categorize and retrieve important information, leading to potential errors and delays in their workflow.

PC Law does not provide the option to create custom fields for documents, cases, or legal billing, which can impede the efficiency of legal billing processes and result in disorganized billing documents. Without the ability to add personalized fields, users may struggle to accurately capture and track key information, such as billing codes, payment terms, and client details, leading to potential errors and delays in the billing cycle.

PC Law does not provide any built-in workflows to guide users through their tasks and cases, which can hinder staff productivity and lead to delays in case progress. Without predefined workflows, users may struggle to keep track of their responsibilities, resulting in potential errors and oversights

PC Law does not provide an eSignature feature to help law firms streamline their document signing process. This lack of modernized functionality can result in increased costs for paper and mailing, and slower case progress. By not offering an eSignature feature, users may experience difficulty obtaining signatures from clients, resulting in unnecessary back-and-forth and longer turnaround times.

PC Law offers a mobile app version, PC Law Go, which allows users to track time and access contact details on the go. However, the functionality of PC Law Go is limited to these basic features, which may not fully meet the needs of users who require more robust mobile capabilities..

PC Law does not provide client portals to enable clients to easily access their case status, payment history, and relevant documents. Without this critical feature, clients may feel disconnected from their cases and experience a lack of transparency in their legal matters. As a result, clients may become dissatisfied with the level of service provided, potentially leading to negative reviews, reduced referrals, and even loss of business.